Tuesday, October 26, 2010
#20 James Garfield (1831-1881)
“James A. Garfield soon disappeared from the public’s memory, and he remains one of America’s least remembered chief executives. ‘For who was Garfield, martyred man, and who had seen him in the streets of life?’ asked the novelist Thomas Wolfe. ‘Who could believe that his footballs ever sounded on a lonely pavement?’ But Garfield did exist—he was a son, a husband, and a father. He lived and breathed and laughed and cried and played a major role in American politics. He was the last of the nation’s ‘born in a log cabin’ presidents, a general during the Civil War, and the quintessential rags-to-riches, self-made American man” (Rutkow, p. 3).
I simply couldn’t remember this guy’s name! Recently, my Mom had casually asked me how many presidents had been killed by assassination and somewhere in my head I knew that the number was 4 (don’t ask me how). But when I went to name them off to her, I could count only three: Lincoln, McKinley, and Kennedy. But I swore there were four of them! Frowning I racked my brain to disgorge the final name but after a few seconds of really heavy mental lifting, I had nothing. Knowing that someday, someday, I would discover that name did not really ease the frustration but that is the best part about reading a bio for every single president—I’m going to get the information eventually.
And here it is, folks! The mystery is solved--#4 is James A Garfield. Aha! Of course I had to call my Mom immediately but it turned out to be one of those situations when you wake up in the middle of the night with the answer on your lips and nobody understands you at all. What I mean to say is my Mom had no clue what I was talking about, I guess, assuming that we had dropped this topic weeks ago. Of course, I was so excited, I didn’t help matters.
“Mom? It’s Garfield! No, I’m Vanya, but Garfield is the answer! Remember when we were talking about assassinations? (annoyance) Come on—you asked me how many presidents were assassinated. I don’t remember when—a couple weeks ago maybe? Don’t you remember? I was having trouble remembering the fourth president to be assassinated and it was driving me crazy. (resignation) Oh nevermind! It doesn’t matter. If it ever comes up in trivia, remember Garfield. No, I have enough money to buy groceries. Gotta go.”
Now that I’m rereading this, I’m a little embarrassed at how excited I was in the first place. It’s not like I’m a kick-ass historical detective or something here but I do like finding out answers to the little questions. It’s too bad that after my euphoria over discovering Garfield’s claim to fame, I then had to read on—and really, it’s too horrible. I’ve been sad over presidents before but my emotions reached a new low with Garfield and his end. Sigh. I guess you should just read on to see what I mean. (I read James A Garfield: American Presidents Series by Ira Rutkow, New York: Times Books, 2006.)
As stated above, James Abram Garfield really was born in a log cabin in Orange, Ohio on November 19, 1831. Only two years later, his father and three siblings would die of pneumonia, leaving Eliza to manage the farm and raise the rest of the children alone. James was clumsy and awkward growing up but he was also ambitious, disciplined and intelligent. He had minimal formal schooling but he was a voracious reader and learned a lot that way.
In October of 1848 aged 16, Garfield left home to become a “sailor” for pontoon boats in the Great Lakes. Unfortunately, Garfield did not know how to swim and nearly drowned several times. Eventually he enrolled himself in the Geauga Academy and then switched to the Western Reserve Eclectic Institute in 1851. Finally, a year later, he went up to Williams College in Massachusetts to receive his degree. While there, he became involved in Republican politics and embraced abolitionism. He graduated in 1856 as the salutatorian.
Having really no money or prospects, Garfield went right into teaching and then became president of the Western Reserve Eclectic Institute. In November 1858, he married Lucretia Randolph, a sweetheart from school days at Geauga and Western Reserve and they moved to a little cottage near the college.
Being very ambitious, Garfield knew he could not stay where he was as a president of a college. In 1859, then, he was elected to the Ohio Senate. “Three qualities immediately set Garfield apart from other senators: a prodigious capacity to grasp the minutiae of legislation, extraordinary speechmaking abilities, and a genuineness in forming friendships” (p. 11). He was also admitted to the bar, by simply reading a few legal books and taking an oral examination. He would never practice as a lawyer—it was simply a fall-back plan in case politics did not work out.
War interrupted and in 1861, Garfield became the lieutenant colonel of 42nd Ohio regiment. From there, they were sent down to Kentucky to take part in the Battle of Middle Creek. They won and Garfield was promoted to brigadier general. He had been wounded and found himself recovering in Washington DC where he made good use of his time networking. He was even elected to the US House of Representatives but since he was still in the military, he had to return to the front. In 1863, he was sent to the Army of the Cumberland in TN and became chief of staff under General Rosecrans. Garfield was severely disillusioned after the loss at the Battle of Chickamauga and left the army to take up his post in congress.
Back in Washington, he joined the group of radical republicans and was immediately placed on the Committee on Military Affairs. He was increasingly involved with the financial aspect of Congress, becoming involved in the Committee of Ways and Means, the Committee of Appropriations, and the Committee of Banking and Currency. “He promoted what might later be called the trickle-down theory of economic growth, whereby the government facilitates the expansion of business productivity on the assumption that all of society will eventually benefit” (p. 31).
In 1880, he was elected to the US Senate, but he was only able to serve a couple months before he was nominated as the Republican National presidential candidate. His nomination came as a complete surprise. The Republican Party had split with the Half-Breeds supporting James G Blaine for president and the Stalwarts backing Ulysses S Grant for a third term. No single candidate was able to receive a majority of votes until Garfield’s name was thrown into the mix. He won the nomination and then, running against the Democratic candidate, General Winfield Scott Hancock, won the presidency despite a truly dirty campaign. “Most observers agree that, in view of the nastiness of the campaign, Garfield’s victory could be regarded as a personal triumph. He had captured the presidency by keeping the party’s faithful focused and united while presenting a positive and modest image to American voters” (p. 62).
Patronage was immediately a problem for Garfield. “In 1881, government jobs seekers enjoyed open access to the executive mansion, and it was not uncommon that they attempted to speak one-on-one with the president to plead their case” (p. 71). Many office seekers were sent away unhappy and unappreciated. But there were other problems on the horizon for Garfield. The first was his hatred of Chester A Arthur, his vice president. Garfield very clearly leaned toward the Half-Breed side of the Republican Party and when he was nominated for the presidency, everyone decided it would be a good idea to pair him with a Stalwart supporter, in this case, Chester Arthur. After the election, Garfield and Arthur could not have been farther apart, politically, and by the summer of 1881, they were not speaking at all. The second problem was the advent of a mother of a scandal which would implicate numerous Washington bigwigs and tons of government postal employees. Called the Star Route Scandal, some government officials decided to charge the government extra to deliver the mail in out-of-the-way places. Garfield cracked down hard on this type of thing.
One of the really great things that Garfield accomplished in office was his reselling of some government bonds that helped pay off some of the debt from the war. It was in a rather good mood that on the morning of July 2, 1881, Garfield and Blaine, the Secretary of State, headed to the train station. Garfield and some of the other cabinet members were going to take a tour of New England. Unfortunately, at the train station, Garfield walked right into an insane, frustrated office seeker, Charles Guiteau, who shot Garfield in the back. Guiteau was a “mentally unstable, penny-ante scalawag, who stole from everyone he knew. He was the child of a deceased schizophrenic mother and a religion-obsessed, know-it-all father” (p. 71-2).
Garfield lay bleeding onto the floor of the train station while people ran around in panic. “Turning Garfield on his side to examine the bullet hole, Townshend [a health officer for the District of Columbia] became the first of what would be numerous individuals to place their unwashed fingers and unclean instruments directly into the president’s wound” (p. 85). Soon several other medical men had joined Townsend, including Doctor Bliss, Garfield’s future physician, and each of them stuck their fingers into the wound to try and ascertain the path of the bullet. Bliss, a Civil War surgeon, soon took over and decided that the bullet had hit the president’s liver and he would not live long.
They finally were able to move the president back to the White House where Bliss maintained a strict regimen of dosing his patient with large quantities of quinine and morphine. Garfield routinely vomited after meals and his temperature began to spike each night above 100 degrees but Bliss and the other doctors believed it to be for the best. “For Bliss and his minions, ancient remedies, old-world philosophies, and a stubborn resistance to scientific progress characterized their every deed and word” (p. 92).
Over the next 80 days, Garfield was kept in near isolation under the orders of Dr. Bliss. He continued to lose weight because of the vomiting and he contracted blood poisoning, abscesses and pneumonia. When he finally died on September 19, 1881, he was more than a hundred pounds thinner, he had tons of abscesses filled with pus all over his body and, after a hasty autopsy, it was discovered that the bullet wound was non-lethal. “Lamb performed the dissection, which revealed that the ball had entered Garfield’s body three and a half inches to the right of the spine, fractured the eleventh and twelfth ribs, passed through thoracic and lumbar vertebrae—without injuring the spinal cord—and lodged deep in the tissues of the president’s left back, apparently a nonlethal injury” (p. 128). Chester A Arthur was sworn in as the next President of the United States.
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
#19: Rutherford B Hayes Part 2
Really Cool Stuff about Rutherford B Hayes
1. During the war, a young second lieutenant and future president, William McKinley, served under Hayes and they became good friends. Hayes eventually appointed McKinley to quartermaster.
2. Hayes had a hand in established what is now known as Ohio State University. “As Ari Hoogenboom [a biographer] has emphasized, the legislature followed his suggestion to establish the Agricultural and Mechanical College, the predecessor of Ohio State University, of which he considered himself a founder” (p. 51).
3. Hayes was the first person to serve three terms as governor of Ohio.
4. With Lucy’s help, Hayes did a good job of modernizing the White House, including the installation of more modern plumbing and a telephone!
5. Lucy was quite famous as a first lady with her own nickname, Lemonade Lucy. The reason for this? No alcohol allowed at the White House. “Immediately after a dinner for a son of the Russian tsar where wine punch was served, Lucy’s ban on alcohol, later winning her the name ‘Lemonade Lucy,’ went into effect as part of the White House cuisine, much to the gratification of temperance advocates” (p. 99).
6. For the first time in history at the White House, on December 30, 1877, Rutherford and Lucy held a giant celebration in honor of their silver anniversary.
7. Amazingly, President Hayes is venerated in Paraguay where he has a holiday, a province, a town, a museum and a soccer team all named in his honor. “In November 1878, arbitrating a dispute between Argentina and Paraguay, the administration awarded the territory between Pilcomayo and the Verde River to Paraguay, so that a whole department of that country was called Presidente Hayes and its capital named after him” (p. 108). The reason the Paraguayans love Hayes so much? The arbitration effectivly gave them 60% of their land.
8. Rutherford Hayes was the first president to go on a tour of the Pacific states.
Well there’s no doubt—Rutherford was pretty vanilla on the presidential scale. He seemed like a good man who was just ambitious enough to want the presidency and then not ambitious enough to keep it for longer than he needed to. In fact, since I’ve read through nearly 20 presidents by now, I find it very odd, and also very impressive, that Hayes was adamantly against having a second term. Other presidents obviously served only one term but Hayes was downright excited to be done with the whole thing. I think that makes Hayes very smart, in my book.
Trefousse did a good job of giving the readers a sense of who Hayes was and what made him tick. Hayes was a socially conscious man who was concerned with civil rights, civil service reform, universal education, and temperance and, at least it seemed to me, he was in politics for the good it could do for others rather than himself. Like all people, Hayes had his own foibles but after the Grant administration, I think that the United States needed a man like Hayes. Upright, serene, and sure—he was a welcome hand at the tiller when we needed him most (I’m speaking primarily about the end of the Reconstruction.) During the Hayes administration, the White House was a polite and
What is ironic is that Hayes was a very uncontroversial figure himself and yet he had one of the most controversial starts to a presidency—thanks to the Bargain of 1877. I wonder what would have happened had Tilden taken the title but I really think that despite all the accusations at the time, the right man did win out.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
#19: Rutherford B Hayes (1822-1893)
“He was one of the best-educated men to occupy the White House, was honest, evenhanded, and humane. Taking over the scandal-besmirched presidency from General Grant, he reestablished the good reputation of the country’s first office and was rewarded with the Republican success of 1880. This was his real achievement” (Trefousse, 129).
Okay, this may mean that I am, perhaps, one of the oddest people in the United States but I actually do remember Rutherford B Hayes. Not well, mind you, but well enough. Maybe it’s due to the fact that the election of 2000 was as screwed up as the election of 1876 or my American History AP class was just that good or I just have one of the superbest memories of the 21st century—I guess we’ll never know. Regardless, here I am sitting on the information that Rutherford B Hayes won a highly contested election resulting in the Compromise of 1877. And see? I remembered the date too! Awesome.
Anywho, since I already have such a fabulous grasp on Hayesian politics I guess I can just skip this one biography. Ha! No such luck, I’m afraid. I can’t remember anything more about this guy so it’s back to the library for me. Actually, the library didn’t have any adult books on Rutheford, the nerve, so I had to venture back onto Amazon. I bought the book, Rutherford B. Hayes: American Presidents Series by Hans L. Trefousse(New York: Times Books, 2002), and upon receiving it in the mail, put it right onto a bookshelf till it was needed. Do you believe in coincidences? Well when I resurrected Rutherford’s bio off the shelf I noticed that this book was written by none other than my old pal from Andrew Johnson days, Hans L. Trefousse! Isn’t that interesting? I guess it really is a small world in the realm of historical academia. Let’s see how old Hans works his magic with a very different gentleman from that of Johnson.
Rutherford Birchard Hayes was born on October 4, 1822 in Delaware, OH. Unfortunately, he was born the same year that his father died of fever and thus, his mother, having inherited some land, had to take care of Rutherford, his sister and a younger brother (who eventually died in a skating accident) by herself. Nicknamed “Rud,” Rutherford was a sandy-haired, blue-eyed boy, and was often sickly. In 1836, he was sent to Norwalk Seminary, a prep school in Connecticut and then in 1838 he moved on to Kenyon College in OH. There he showed Whig tendencies and graduated as the valedictorian in 1842.
He decided that he wanted to be a lawyer so he enrolled the next year at Harvard Law School, even though this was before the time that lawyers needed a special degree. He graduated in 1845 and was immediately admitted to the bar, leaving him free to settle in the small town of Fremont, OH. Not caring to conduct business in such a tiny location, Rutherford soon moved himself and his practice to Cincinnati.
It was around 1847 that Rutherford met the young, Lucy Ware Webb, while she was attending Ohio Wesleyan College. They married in 1850 and eventually had 8 children, although only 5 lived. Rutherford continued to make his name as a very good defense attorney and abolitionist lawyer. He was passionately against slavery and would frequently take on fugitive slave cases. In 1858 he was elected as the city’s solicitor and in 1860, the presidential election year, Hayes served as vice chairman of the Republican Executive Committee of Hamilton County. Slowly he was moving up in the world.
With the advent of the Civil War, Hayes volunteered and was made a major. “Toward the end of July, the regiment was ordered to move into what was soon to become West Virginia, to guard the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, secure the Kanawha Valley, and support the Unionists in the area” (p. 23). He was soon promoted to lieutenant colonel and then after Antietam, where he was wounded, he was made a full colonel. His regiment was then placed under Sheridan and Hayes made brigadier general which culminated in 1865 to being made brevet major general.
Also in 1865, with the war ending, Hayes, as a military hero, was voted to represent Ohio in the US House of Representatives. He served in congress during Reconstruction and he had very definitive ideas of where the Southern states stood after the war. “Like many other Republicans he believed that the Southern states had forfeited their rights and ought to be reconstructed by Congress, but unlike [Thaddeus] Stevens did not feel that they were conquered provinces and were thus no longer covered by the Constitution” (p. 41). This thinking brought Hayes into early conflict with President Johnson. “Voting to override the veto , Hayes thereafter strongly opposed Johnson, who, he felt, had fallen completely under the influence of former rebels” (p. 42).
He only served two years as a congressman before he resigned to run for governor of Ohio and won. In 1868 he also was an elector to the Republican National Convention where he voted and nominated Grant for president. In 1871, he resigned as governor and the very next year he lost an election to congress. During this forced retirement, Hayes got into real estate and was given the Assistant Treasurer position for the state.
He was voted in to an unprecedented third term as governor where he spent most of his time increasing educational awareness and other causes. “In his final message, on January 2, 1877, he was able to take credit for the reduction of the state’s debt, the establishment of various welfare institutions, and the geological survey” (p. 63). Before this final message however in 1876, Hayes had been nominated for president on the Republican National ticket. He was paired opposite Samuel Tilden, Democrat, and no one could tell which candidate would win, both being relatively unknown. It initially looked like Tilden would take the popular vote but it then came to everyone’s attention that votes had been mishandled in South Carolina, Florida, and Louisiana. The disputed election went to the House of Representatives but the Constitution was mum on this particular development, so Congress ended up voting a 15-man commission to decide the matter. Hayes won.
Although Hayes was the 19th President of the United States, the country was still divided over the results, while the Democrats fairly howling with rage and calling the president “Rutherfraud.” The “Bargain of 1876” was struck when Hayes declared that he would end all Reconstruction in the South by removing the military presence there.
As president, Hayes went immediately to work ending Reconstruction and promoting civil rights, civil service reform, and universal education. However, his early presidential years were marked by controversy. He had problems with his cabinet, with patronage appointments, with the way he ended Reconstruction and his adherence to the need of civil service reform. At that time office seekers simply stalked the president in the White House but Hayes wished to have civil service offices given by merit and wanted to institute an exam that would preclude promotion. There were also railroad strikes (which the government had to put down) and immigration policies. “All in all, the first two years of the Hayes administration were more successful than could have expected after the disputed election. As the Atlantic Monthly pointed out, interference in stated elections had been abandoned, financial obligations vindicated, burdens of taxation had been lifted, and national credit secured” (p. 109).
He worked hard the next few years as well but he was quite happy to leave the presidency after just one term. Hayes was adamant about not being re-nominated and was quite satisfied with the election of James Garfield. He was satisfied with the job he had done but was not anxious to have the job any longer. “I am now in my last year of the Presidency,” Hayes wrote “and look forward to its close as a schoolboy longs for the coming vacation” (p. 119).
This time his retirement was real. He became the director of the First National Bank of Fremont while taking the time to enlarge his own home, Spiegel Grove. He remained very active in several military and educational associations and he continued to travel. He was interested and active in promoting educational opportunities and civil rights for the rest of his life. In June 1889, his wife, Lucy, died of stroke, leaving Hayes bereft. He would follow her several years later, on January 7, 1893, when he died of a heart attack.
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
Presidential Birthdays
Presidential Birthdays
I thought it would be interesting (for me and you) to celebrate each Presidential Birthday. Thus, I am including a giant list in my PRP. So in honor of Rutherford B. Hayes (who was born on Monday, along with my brother) and Chester A Arthur, here are all the President’s birthdays by month. Yay!
January
1/7/1800 Millard Fillmore Cayuga County, NY
1/9/1913 Richard Nixon Yorba Linda, CA
1/29/1843 William McKinley Niles, OH
1/30/1882 Franklin D. Roosevelt Hyde Park, NY
February
2/6/1911 Ronald Reagan Tampico, IL
2/9/1773 William Henry Harrison Charles City County, VA
2/12/1809 Abraham Lincoln Hardin County, KY
2/22/1732 George Washington Pope’s Creek, VA
March
3/15/1767 Andrew Jackson Waxhaw, NC
3/16/1751 James Madison Port Conway, VA
3/18/1837 Grover Cleveland Caldwell, NJ
3/29/1790 John Tyler Charles City County, VA
April
4/13/1743 Thomas Jefferson Goochland County, VA
4/23/1791 James Buchanan Cove Gap, PA
4/27/1822 Ulysses S Grant Point Pleasant, OH
4/28/1758 James Monroe Westmoreland County, VA
May
5/8/1884 Harry Truman Lamar, MO
5/29/1917 John F Kennedy Brookline, MA
June
6/12/1924 George H.W. Bush Milton, MA
July
4/4/1872 Calvin Coolidge Plymouth, VT
4/6/1946 George W Bush New Haven, CT
4/11/1767 John Quincy Adams Braintree, MA
4/14/1913 Gerald Ford Omaha, NE
August
8/4/1961 Barack Obama Honolulu, Hawaii
8/10/1874 Herbert Hoover West Branch, IA
8/19/1946 William (Bill) Clinton Hope, AR
8/20/1833 Benjamin Harrison North Bend, OH
8/27/1908 Lyndon B Johnson Stonwall, TX
September
9/15/1857 William H Taft Cincinnati, OH
October
10/1/1924 Jimmy Carter Plains, GA
10/4/1822 Rutherford B Hayes Delaware, OH
10/5/1829 Chester A Arthur Fairfield, VT
10/14/1890 Dwight Eisenhower Denison, TX
10/27/1858 Theodore Roosevelt New York, NY
10/30/1735 John Adams Braintree, MA
November
11/2/1795 James K Polk Mecklenburg County, NC
11/2/1865 Warren Harding Corsica, OH
11/19/1831 James Garfield Moreland Hills, OH
11/23/1804 Franklin Pierce Hillsborough, NH
11/24/1784 Zachary Taylor Orange County, VA
December
12/5/1782 Martin Van Buren Kinderhook, NY
12/28/1856 Woodrow Wilson Staunton, VA
12/29/1808 Andrew Johnson Raleigh, NC
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
#18: Ulysses S Grant Part 2
“If Washington had been the father of his country, Ulysses Grant was its savior” (Bunting, 2004, p. 84).
Cool Stuff about Ulysses S. Grant
1. I wonder if you noticed this or not but I called Grant, Hiram Ulysses, to start his bio. That’s because he was christened Hiram Ulysses. His name was changed when he went to West Point because the congressman recommending him got it wrong to begin with, dubbing him Ulysses Simpson Grant. West Point, then left it as Ulysses S and the rest is history. Since Grant was so quiet and unassuming, he decided to just stick with the change of name rather than go through the trouble of changing it back.
2. Grant. Loved. Horses. He had a sort of horse-whisperer quality about him, allowing him to ride anything. Hence the livery stable he had as a kid. Later on he would surprise his peers as an acclaimed horseman. “He was known and admired as the best horseman at West Point, and later the finest horseman in the army” (p. 18).
3. Grant’s nickname at West Point was “Sam.” Everyone at school thought his name stood for “Uncle Sam.”
4. In Mexico, Grant once took a treacherous ride alone in search of more ammunition for his regiment. “Here his supreme skill as a rider probably saved his life and made possible the relief of his unit: Grant braved direct fire from the streets of Monterrey, riding like a movie cowboy, hanging by stirrups and cantle, keeping the horse’s massive body between himself and the enemy” (p. 24).
5. Grant is commonly thought to only have voted once in his entire life. “Grant had in fact voted in 1856—the only election in which he is known to have voted: he cast his ballot for the Democratic candidate, James Buchanan. About the Republican nominee, John C. Fremont, Grant would only say, ‘I knew Fremont’” (p. 33).
6. After Shiloh in 1862, Grant very seriously considered resigning from the army and would have without the council of William Tecumseh Sherman. “Halleck, however, removed Grant from command, assigned him the meaningless job of second in command (duties unprescribed), and redoubled his criticism, always behind Grant’s back, to army colleagues. Had it not been for the intervention of his friend Sherman, who found him despondent and about to leave the army on furlough, Grant would have departed this strange predicament at once” (p. 47). Can you imagine how the course of the Civil War might have been different had Grant retired instead?
7. After the Battle of Chattanooga, a bill passed through Congress to reinstate the rank of lieutenant general which was then conferred upon Grant. Do you know the last man to hold the rank of lieutenant general? That’s right—George Washington.
8. Grant spearheaded the movement to pass the 15th Amendment through Congress; thus giving black Americans the right to vote.
9. Grant created the Department of Justice to deal with Reconstruction problems. With all the racial issues in the South, Grant could not allow the army to be called out with each disturbance so he put the Department of Justice under the jurisdiction of the Attorney General and saw to it that they made sure the laws were being enacted in the South.
10. It was during the Grant administration that the Ku Klux Klan had their heyday. The Klan used violence, terrorism, and intimidation against black Americans in the South to disrupt voting and other events. “It struck through the South, doing its work mainly at night, its instruments comprising kidnapping, murder, arson, beatings, and the terror induced by not knowing when, or where, it would strike next (black churches were particularly favored targets), together with the certain knowledge that local law enforcement, when not actually conniving in such activities, would itself be sufficiently intimidated to do nothing” (p. 113). Grant pushed through the Ku Klux Klan bill in 1871 threatening to send the troops to settle Klan-related disturbances.
11. Really quick—I have to give a little Shout Out to my boy, Lew Wallace, whom I ran across in this Grant bio! Lew Wallace was a general in the Union Army and at one point in Tennessee, fought under Grant. But the best part is when Wallace went on later to write that awesome book, Ben-Hur. Sigh.
This was a pretty good biography about Grant. Although it was not the most exciting or best written biography I’ve read (I’m thinking Martin Van Buren, here, people!), I enjoyed the way that the author uses a lot of modern-day comparisons to help us understand what happened back in that day. For instance, Bunting draws the comparison between the Guilded Age (Grant’s administration) and the Roaring Twenties in America or the Regency period in England. Both time periods excelled in the arts and were a sort of backlash against years of war. Interesting. I love when the dots are connected.
Grant and I also see eye-to-eye on one particular thing: the right to vote. I am a huge proponent of voting and am disappointed in our national turnouts for current elections. As a proud citizen of the United States of America, I was given the right to vote by my forebears who fought and died for it. Thus, I believe that getting up off your (and my) lazy ass and voting for whom we think should govern our great nation should be a gimme. Grant agrees with me here. In his first inaugural address he mentions how vital it is for the nation and freed men to have this right. “It set forth those things important to Grant: the healing commonality of all American citizens—their membership in the restored American nation, a membership not to be defined by race or region, and in which the defining act of citizenship must be voting” (p. 89). Voting is important, people! I would like to see everyone get out there on Election Day to do your American duty. Seriously.
I am sorry that, in the public mind, Grant will forever be linked to the myriad dishonesties that enveloped the Reconstruction era because I really believe that he was a good man and a good president. After his trip around the world, Grant’s contemporary reputation grew almost back to what it was around Appomattox but I’m afraid that this surge did not help his overall reputation in the long run.
I have to say that I was a little shocked at all the scandals during the Grant administration. Bunting, throughout the book, depicted a Grant that was forthright and incorruptible, in a way, and yet his second term as president is literally littered with dishonesty and corruption. I was confused as to how this could have happened but then I had to remember that being a successful general and being a successful president are two totally different things. To be fair, none of the scandals involved Grant personally, aiding the idea that Grant was, personally, honest and aboveboard. However, I believe that he was notoriously lax when it came to his associates’ morals and a little too easy-going to stop any funny business from happening.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)